If you read my last post about the Polar Vortex, you will remember that higher temperatures in the Arctic can disrupt that fairly stable and consistent weather pattern, forcing the jet stream farther south than normal, bringing with it colder temperatures. Global Climate Change could not only disrupt that weather pattern, but many, many others. It is called "Climate Change" for that very reason. We once thought that rising temperatures would mean just melting ice and rising seas. Now we see evidence that not only will we witness those particular effects, but we will also see wildly fluctuating temperatures and weather events. And not just here, but everywhere in the world.
Let's be honest. This is just one week in one small part of the world ( and yes, the Eastern United States makes up just a small percentage of the world's total area, believe it or not). What's happening right now along the Eastern Seaboard cannot be taken as a definitive sign of Global Climate Change. We have to look around elsewhere to see if similar events are taking place. Like in Australia, where they are experiencing record breaking heat. Again. They are surpassing the records set over the last few years in many places on the Australian continent this week, and barely anyone is talking about it. Why? I can only speculate, but its probably due to the Northern Hemisphere bias that exists in today's world.
Did you realize that such a bias existed? Its logical , if you think about it. Most the of the world's population lives in the Northern Hemisphere. It is estimated that around 10% of the world's population lives in the Southern Hemisphere, which makes sense since most of the land mass of the world is located in the Northern Hemisphere. That, coupled with the Western slant that our news, policies, events and activities have due to political power, population density and resource allocation, prevents us from seeing the whole picture. We don't hear about record high temps in Australia or Super Cyclones in the South Pacific because those places are far away and no one really lives there. If hardly anyone lives there, why should we care?
fig 1 courtesy of econstudentlog.wordpress.com |
If your car was running strange, knocking and pinging, belching out dark sooty material from the tailpipe and dripping a gray sludgy material from the muffler, you would most likely take it to a mechanic, right? If that mechanic looked at the battery and tugged on a fan belt under the hood and said your car was running fine, would you feel confident he was right and be on your merry way? Or would tell him to look at the fuel injectors, the pistons, the exhaust system and the muffler since the battery and the fan belt seemed to have little to do with the tailpipe? You don't have to be an expert on cars to understand he did a half-assed assessment of the problem, do you? Why don't we take the same approach when it comes to our planet, our wellbeing and our future?
It is fine to debate scientific theories and predictions. That's what makes science great! Peer review, deliberation and further study are what moves science forward and leads to a better understanding and more accurate theories. But one must to look at as many variables as possible, or things will be incomplete and can lead to misconceptions. Ninety percent of the world's population may live in the Northern Hemisphere, but weather patterns exist all over the globe. They are inter-connected. Examining that data over long periods of time will give a more accurate picture of what is really taking place. Latching on to one severe cold snap that occurs over a three day period to debunk decades and even centuries of data is irresponsible, especially when we are seeing another year begin with record breaking heat and extreme weather in other places in world.
Is this thing on?
ReplyDelete